Health care entrepreneurs and other businesses looking to raise investment from private investors without registration in accordance with applicable federal and state securities laws requirements for publicly traded investments need to exercise care that their practices meet all requirements, particularly in light of recent changes to the regulations.
For example, health care, health care IT and other businesses looking to raise capital in a private versus publicly registered context often plan to rely upon the restriction of offers and sales to individuals who qualify as “accredited investors” and other compliance with the accredited investor exemptions to registration requirements under federal and state securities laws.
When planning to raise capital, however, reliance on past experience and recycling old documents can be risky. Due to recent changes in the accredited investor regulations, however, businesses intending to rely upon the accredited investor exception may need to update their accredited investor questionnaires and other practices to avoid unintentionally running afoul of modified rules.
On December 21, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules that amended the “accredited investor” definition in the rules under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The recent regulatory amendments respond to securities laws changes enacted by Section 413(a) of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”).
Among many other changes it enacted, Dodd-Frank requires the definition of “accredited investor” in the Securities Act rules to exclude the value of a person’s primary residence for purposes of determining whether the person qualifies as an “accredited investor” on the basis of having a net worth in excess of US $1,000,000.
Securities Act Rules 215 and 501, as amended, in response to Dodd-Frank now define “accredited investor” to include, among other things, any natural person whose individual net worth, or joint net worth with that person’s spouse, exceeds US$1,000,000, excluding the value of the investor’s primary residence. SEC regulations provide guidance about the application of this revised requirement.
Because of the change to the accredited investor requirements of federal securities laws, investor questionnaires may need to be updated to reflect the new definition. Investors relying on the net worth category of the accredited investor definition may also need to get valuations of their residences to determine their fair market value and may also need to disclose the value of any mortgages thereon and the timing of when such mortgages were incurred to confirm accredited investor status.
The changes to the accredited investor exemption rules is just one of many changes in securities registration exemption, reporting, and other requirements. Protect yourself and your business. Review your practices and documentation to confirm they are up to date and compliant before you get started and keep a careful eye on compliance and out for more changes coming down the pike on an ongoing basis.
Interested persons can see a copy of the SEC’s final rule here.
For More Information Or Assistance
If you need assistance reviewing or responding to these or other health care related risk management, compliance, enforcement or management concerns, the author of this update, attorney Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, may be able to help. Vice President of the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association, Past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Section and the former Board Compliance Chair of the National Kidney Foundation of North Texas, Ms. Stamer has more than 24 years experience advising health industry clients about these and other matters. Her experience includes advising hospitals, nursing home, home health, rehabilitation and other health care providers and health industry clients to establish and administer compliance and risk management policies; prevent, conduct and investigate, and respond to peer review and other quality concerns; and to respond to Board of Medicine, Department of Aging & Disability, Drug Enforcement Agency, OCR Privacy and Civil Rights, HHS, DOD and other health care industry investigation, enforcement and other compliance, public policy, regulatory, staffing, and other operations and risk management concerns.
A popular lecturer and widely published author on health industry concerns, Ms. Stamer continuously advises health industry clients about compliance and internal controls, workforce and medical staff performance, quality, governance, reimbursement, and other risk management and operational matters. Ms. Stamer also publishes and speaks extensively on health and managed care industry regulatory, staffing and human resources, compensation and benefits, technology, public policy, reimbursement and other operations and risk management concerns. Her insights on these and other related matters appear in the Health Care Compliance Association, Atlantic Information Service, Bureau of National Affairs, The Wall Street Journal, Business Insurance, the Dallas Morning News, Modern Health Care, Managed Healthcare, Health Leaders, and a many other national and local publications. You can get more information about her health industry experience here. If you need assistance responding to concerns about the matters discussed in this publication or other health care concerns, wish to obtain information about arranging for training or presentations by Ms. Stamer, wish to suggest a topic for a future program or update, or wish to request other information or materials, please contact Ms. Stamer via telephone at (214) 452-8297 or via e-mail here.
If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns from Ms. Stamer, see here.
About Solutions Law Press
Solutions Law Press™ provides business risk management, legal compliance, management effectiveness and other resources, training and education on human resources, employee benefits, compensation, data security and privacy, health care, insurance, and other key compliance, risk management, internal controls and other key operational concerns. If you find this of interest, you also be interested reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press resources including:
- Minimum Wage, Overtime Risks Highlighted By Labor Department Strike Force Targeting Residential Care & Group Homes
- Update Charity and Sliding Fee Scale Policies For 2012 Federal Poverty Rate Changes
- ONC Releases Proposed Rules For Meaningful Use Stage 2
- DOJ & HHS Health Care Fraud Enforcement Nets $4 Billion + In 2011\
- Update Charity and Sliding Fee Scale Policies For 2012 Federal Poverty Rate Changes
- Texas Physicians Get New Option For Resolving Some Medical Board Complaint
- Broad-Reaching Prosecution Of Individuals Participating In Operations Of Companies Convicted Of Fraud Shows Risks Of Participation
- Hospitals Can Expect CMS To Add Hospital Incident Reporting To Surveys In Response To OIG Report
- North Texas Medical Supply Company Owner Indicted For Health Care Fraud Now Also Charged With Immigration Fraud
- DOL Proposes Tighter Overtime, Minimum Wage Rules For Home Care Workers, Continues Scrutiny Of Health Care Employers
- DFW Hospital Council Foundation Among 26 Organizations Selected To Lead Quality Effort
- Former Houston Texas Physician Gets 70 Month Prison Sentence For Fraud Conviction
- Euless Healthcare Corporation Owner, Associates Face Conspiracy And Health Care Fraud Charges For Alleged Submission Of $700,000+ In Fraudulent Health Care Claims
- Former Manager 9th Employee Sentenced For Involvement In Maxim Medicare False Claims Action
- Medical Identity Theft/Fraud Convictions Highlight Need For Health Care Providers To Safeguard Health Information, Guard Against Fraud Schemes
- Detroit-Area Foot Doctor Pleads Guilty to Medicare Fraud Scheme
- Merck To Pay $950 Million To Settle Vioxx® Off-Label Marketing Charges
- Texas Physicians Get New Option For Resolving Some Medical Board Complaint
- Broad-Reaching Prosecution Of Individuals Participating In Operations Of Companies Convicted Of Fraud Shows Risks Of Participation
- Hospitals Can Expect CMS To Add Hospital Incident Reporting To Surveys In Response To OIG Report
- Quality, Recordkeeping & Unprofessional Conduct Lead Reasons For Medical Board Discipline of Physicians
- DEA Cautions Practitioners Must Restrict Delegation of Controlled Substance Prescribing Functions, Urges Adoption of Written Policies & Agreements
If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information – including your preferred e-mail – by creating or updating your profile here. For important information concerning this communication click here.
THE FOLLOWING DISCLAIMER IS INCLUDED TO COMPLY WITH AND IN RESPONSE TO U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230 REGULATIONS. ANY STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY THE WRITER TO BE USED, AND NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN CAN BE USED BY YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (1) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED UNDER FEDERAL TAX LAW, OR (2) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TAX-RELATED TRANSACTION OR MATTER ADDRESSED HEREIN.
©2012 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, P.C. Non-exclusive license to republish granted to Solutions Law Press. All other rights reserved.
slphealthcareupdate.com 